Yet most of the people insisting that gays have a right to cake will not argue for, and in fact will viciously oppose, the basic right to life for infant children. The dead bodies of children pile up all around us, and all these clowns can do is whine about their right to pastries.
It’s preposterous. Also, deplorable, barbaric, and evil. We have a right to PRODUCTS but a baby has no right to be free from decapitation and dismemberment?
It makes no sense. None of it makes any sense:
So whatever supernatural force bestows us with our right to commodities, this omnipotent being did not, it turns out, also give us the right to exist to begin with. You have the right to have, but not to be, which seems like a logistical complication considering the minor difficulty of having something when you aren’t something. Might abortion be opposed, then, on the grounds that murdering a child will impede his right to eventually have his gay wedding catered by the business of his choosing?
No, it doesn't make sense. It is as if moral values have been turned upside down and they have.
So the right to pastry supercedes the right to life.
Read more at http://themattwalshblog.com/2015/03/31/its-legal-to-kill-babies-but-lets-worry-about-a-gay-persons-right-to-cake/#pEQjAOkTUhMsB6Vu.99