Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Pro Abortion Logic Back at You

This woman is brilliantly funny, irreverent yes, but funny you have to give her.

Ann Coulter with Bill O'Reilly

Bill O'Reilly begins the interview with Ann Coulter, stating that "there has been so much reaction from the liberal left-wing media to our reporting on it (Tiller's murder) that I think you should know what's going on." Coulter is the author of Guilty, Liberal Victims and Their Assault upon America. O'Reilly notes that there are a few right-wing women who are talking about the Tiller murder, but very few "of the right-wing men pundits talk about it". He goes on to say that he was never surprised that media like the NY Times were on Tiller's side while he was alive, but what he doesn't understand is the vitriolic attacks upon him (O'Reilly) in reporting on Tiller's death.

Many liberals have been pointing fingers at people like Bill O'Reilly, Jill Stanek, and Father Frank Pavone, accusing them of inflaming the abortion debate and inciting someone to kill George Tiller. But the liberal left defends abortion, even late term abortion, and they are coming out in favour of assisted suicide and euthanasia; why is it, Coulter asks

in this one case, they're finally against someone dying: a man responsible for killing 60,000 babies?


Coulter also states that 80% of the American population are against late term abortion; yet liberals on the left have to defend these terrible abortions, just as they have to defend infanticide and euthanasia. Their track record is that they are on the pro-death side. They are not pro-choice; they are pro-death.

Coulter pulls no punches; when O'Reilly states that Tiller was doing late-term abortions for the most casual of reasons, Coulter interrupts and says "he was doing it for the money." And here is a taste of Coulter's sarcasm:

I don't like really like to think of it as a murder, it was terminating Tiller in the 203rd trimester .... I am personally opposed to shooting abortionists, but I don't want to impose my moral values on others.... But their logic is if you don't believe in abortion, then don't have an abortion; if you don't believe in shooting abortionists, then don't shoot an abortionist. No, their logic is always for death.... I'm talking the pro-abortion liberals, that is pretty much the Democratic party.


Coulter wraps up by stating that the liberal left is afraid to face this horrendous issue of late term abortion and that it is crazy to be afraid of this issue. Accusing the pro-life movement, which is demonstrably peaceful, of inciting the murder of Tiller is absolutely in contradiction to the media treatment of Muslim terrorism. After September 11, great pains were taken not to accuse the Muslim people on the whole of this crime; however an abortion doctor is killed and everyone in the left wing media proclaims that the pro-life movement is guilty.

Not only is their logic inverted, but they do not use the same standard to judge the actions of different people. Now what is that called? oh yeah, bias.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Alberta woman sentenced to life in prison for neglecting to request Dr. Tiller's assistance in killing of her own baby.

With prices for healthy newborn babies rising sharply on Canadian adoption market and supply dwindling rapidly, provincial government operated human trafficking industry refuses to face reality of unrestricted abortions in Canada and instead of calling for across the board abortion ban they declare war on Canadian baby breeders (unmarried teenage girls).

Just read recent news from Alberta: Woman gets life for destruction of children traffickers' inventory of human pets for sale. The fact that young girl tried to induce miscarriage during her pregnancy is used to prove her intent to kill her baby after her baby was born.
Let us get it straight: It would have been perfectly legal for her to have an suction curettage abortion procedure done by a mass murderer like a infamous Dr. Tiller even few hours before she gave birth to her baby. That procedure most likely would rendered her infertile and made her into a paying customer of baby traffickers when she grew older, but if she tried to induce miscarriage just so she would preserve her fertility for better times it is used in court as a proof of her murderous intentions.

In the eyes of Alberta's Court destruction of children traffickers' inventory seems to be a very serious offence that calls for a very harsh penalty and as a result young woman found guilty of second degree murder got life sentence with no eligibility of parole for ten years. For comparison two young women in Ontario found guilty of first degree murder of their own mother were sentenced to a maximum of ten years in jail (after four years in jail one of them got recently released just so she can attend University).

http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=1725901

Effert case revives questions about Canada's infanticide laws
Kevin Libin, National Post Published: Tuesday, June 23, 2009

More On This Story
Mistrial rejected, Alberta mother who killed baby gets life

Lawyer asks for mistrial in Alberta baby killing

Accused In Baby Killing Called A Liar

Slain baby was a 'helpless soul,' trial hears......


http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=1725168

Mistrial rejected, Alberta mother who killed baby gets life
Lawyer to file appeal

Karen Kleiss, Canwest News Service Published: Tuesday, June 23, 2009

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/2009/06/22/bathtub-murders.html

'Bathtub girl' killer gets early release for university studies
Last Updated: Monday, June 22, 2009 | 12:46 PM ET CBC News

One of two Mississauga sisters convicted four years ago of killing their mother will be let out of prison and allowed to move to a halfway house.